Governor’s Desk
AB 1761 is on the Governor’s desk. If signed the bill will become law.
CalCCA is sponsoring AB 1761, authored by Assemblymember Chris Rogers (D-Santa Rosa), which brings transparency to the way the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA), a charge on nearly all energy bills, is calculated. Coauthors include Assemblymembers Bauer-Kahan, Boerner, Connolly, Petrie-Norris, and Ward and Senator Arreguín.
Background
Electricity bills in California are on the rise, in part due to challenging market conditions and outdated and inefficient regulatory policies. Families and businesses are feeling the impact. Lawmakers and regulators need practical, consumer-focused solutions that ensure customers do not pay more than your fair share.
One tool to ensure customers receive energy bills that are fair and accurate is increased transparency in how PCIA charges are calculated. The PCIA is a fee designed to ensure customers who leave utility generation service, like customers of a Community Choice Aggregator (CCA) or Energy Service Provider (ESP), pay their portion of legacy power costs. But since the PCIA was implemented, there has been no consistent standard for what data must be made available in any CPUC process or proceeding where the PCIA, or a related charge, is set.
Problem
CCAs, ESPs, and their customers must pay the PCIA charge but often lack access to the data, assumptions, and methods used to set it. This transparency problem leads to disputes, inefficiencies, and unexpected rate impacts for customers. More specifically:
•Disclosures vary by utility and by CPUC proceeding, resulting in repeated fights between CCAs and Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs) over data access and increased administrative inefficiencies as the CPUC resolves disputes on a case-by-case basis.
•Utilities sometimes make mistakes. In a 2019 PG&E proceeding, CalCCA identified $73 million in errors (including a $16 million increase for CCA customers). In a recent proceeding, PG&E identified an accounting error that would have cost CCA customers $217 million.
•In an ongoing PCIA Rulemaking, the Commission withheld information on the evidence underlying their proposal and the rate impacts of a proposed change. The CPUC did not respond to a Public Records Act request for the information.
Without adequate transparency, CCAs and ESPs are unable to verify the accuracy of the PCIA charges that their customers must pay and cannot confidently forecast rates – both of which are affordability tools needed to protect customers from unexpected rate increases.
Solution
AB 1761 proposes amending the Public Utilities Code to require the CPUC and IOUs to disclose all data used to calculate PCIA costs, including cost inputs, forecasting assumptions, and methodologies. The bill would also ensure that when parties make proposals in a proceeding to change the PCIA they provide all the underlying data informing that proposal. Sensitive information would remain protected through Commission-approved nondisclosure agreements – a practice already used to protect sensitive information in other compliance areas.
Greater transparency allows CCAs and ESPs to better advocate for their customers and assess proposals to change the PCIA. It also can inform cost forecasts and shield customers from sudden rate swings. It reduces repeated fights over information, improves regulatory efficiency, and encourages utilities to verify calculations since the underlying data would be open to review. Costs to implement the proposal are miniscule, as most of this information already exists, while the benefits for rate, accuracy, stability, and consumer protection are substantial. This proposal strengthens confidence that customers pay their fair share — and not more.
For more on the PCIA go to: https://cal-cca.org/pcia/.
Check back soon for more on AB 1761!